Nikita, this is cool, e.g. as lighttable does not yet fully support 1.9. Can you say something about how are these backports derived? so that I can get an intuition into how much it is at par with the real thing? Does it involve a lot of code rewrite to backport each 1.9 alpha version?
On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 at 3:16:39 PM UTC+3, Nikita Prokopov wrote: > > Hi! > > Not sure if a good idea or bad, but if you were eager to play with latest > version of clojure.spec but don’t want to upgrade your production to alpha > version of the language, you can add clojure.spec capabilities as a library > to 1.8: > > https://github.com/tonsky/clojure-future-spec > > :dependencies [ > [org.clojure/clojure "1.8.0"] > [clojure-future-spec "1.9.0-alpha8"] > ] > > (require '[clojure.spec :as spec]) > (require '[clojure.spec.gen :as spec.gen]) > (require '[clojure.future :refer :all]) > > clojure.future namespace contains all new clojure.core functions like > int?, seqable? etc > > The version numbers will follow clojure 1.9 versions. Expect this lib > upgraded with every new Clojure alpha release until 1.9 if finally out. > > Nikita. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
