Perfect! Closing the channel is simpler than using a kill channel (in the cases when its possible to do this - if something else owns the channel then you can't use this method of course).
On 1 September 2014 11:41, Dhruv Bhatia <dh...@dhruvbhatia.com> wrote: > Thanks for reviewing my solution Daniel. I can confirm that > cljs.core.async.impl.channels.ManyToManyChannel.closed gets set to true after > my component is unmounted and (<! subscriber-ch)subsequently returns nil, > so it looks to be working as expected! > > Cheers, > Dhruv Bhatia > > > On Aug 31, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Daniel Kersten <dkers...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I assume that (<! subscriber-ch)will return nil when subscriber-ch is > closed? I vaguely remember this to be the case, though have not tested it. > If it does, then your way looks good to me. > > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
