On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Gary Verhaegen <gary.verhae...@gmail.com> wrote: > :optimization :whitespace is only slightly slower than none in my > experience, and requires no hackery.
Not in my experience. Recompiles with :none can take as little as tens of milliseconds. More importantly *only* :none will supply you with accurate source maps. Also while it may seem inconvenient, requiring that you manually inline third party scripts under :none is valueable - you know you are debugging precisely the released source of the third party library with exact line numbers. While admittedly more can be done from the ClojureScript compiler standpoint, customizing your HTML generation to do the right thing is very straightforward these days with tools like environ. See Chestnut to see how this can be done in your own projects if you are looking for a reference. I think there are only two settings worth using: :none & :advanced. David -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
