Debug dependency problems with `lein deps :plugin-tree` and `:tree`. These show you what your actual dependencies are and why.
Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 9, 2015, at 12:15 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It appears one of your dependencies is pulling in an older version of Clojure. > > David > >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:03 AM, David Petrovics <dpetrov...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Hi Francis, >> >> I tried figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT, got the (No such var: ana/forms-seq*) >> exception, then added [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"] to the plugins >> and am now seeing: >> >> java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not locate cljs/analyzer__init.class or >> cljs/analyzer.clj on classpath: , compiling:(figwheel_sidecar/utils.clj:1:1) >> >> I'm on [lein-cljsbuild "1.1.1"], [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"], >> [org.clojure/clojure "1.7.0"], [org.omcljs/om >> "0.8.8"], [lein-figwheel "0.5.0-SNAPSHOT"] >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 5:44:03 AM UTC-5, Francis Avila wrote: >> > For future travelers. >> > >> > If you use figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT you will get this exception: >> > >> > >> > clojure.lang.Compiler$CompilerException: java.lang.RuntimeException: No >> > such var: ana/forms-seq*, compiling:(figwheel_sidecar/utils.clj:49:21) >> > >> > figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT has a dependency on cljs 1.7.145 even though it >> > needs 1.7.170. >> > >> > To resolve this error you must explicitly depend on clojurescript in your >> > plugins. Example: >> > >> > :plugins [[lein-figwheel "0.5.0-SNAPSHOT"] >> > [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"]] ;; Overrides broken >> > lein-figwheel dependency. >> > >> > lein deps :tree shows cljs 1.7.170 is used. >> > >> > So, >> > >> > >> > >> > On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 3:30:05 AM UTC-6, Maria Geller wrote: >> > > Try using 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT for figwheel ;) >> > > >> > > On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 9:59:24 PM UTC+13, Francis Avila >> > > wrote:I'm getting the following exception with figwheel builds (using >> > > 0.4.1): >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > java.lang.AbstractMethodError: Method >> > > clojurescript_build/core/CompilableSourcePaths._find_sources(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object; >> > > is abstract >> > > >> > > at clojurescript_build.core.CompilableSourcePaths._find_sources >> > > (core.clj:-1) >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > (cljsbuild works fine with version 1.1.1) >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Nolan said "All the mentioned tools [inc. figwheel] have already >> > > accounted for this change." I don't see any mention in the figwheel docs >> > > about cljs 1.7.170 compatibility or any commit message that mentions it. >> > > Can anyone confirm this is actually true for figwheel? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 6:05:19 AM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote: >> > > >> > > > ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source code. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > Leiningen dependency information: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"] >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > This release includes a major refactor of the build pipeline thanks to >> > > >> > > > Juho Teperi. This change along with some greatly simplified >> > > >> > > > recompilation logic will mean much faster cold build times for larger >> > > >> > > > projects (some users have already reported >10X). >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > This is a breaking change for existing tooling. You will need to >> > > >> > > > upgrade lein-cljsbuild, lein-figwheel, and boot-cljs if you intend to >> > > >> > > > adopt this version of ClojureScript. All the mentioned tools have >> > > >> > > > already accounted for this change. Refer to the appropriate >> > > >> > > > documentation for your tooling to determine which version number you >> > > >> > > > should adopt. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > Other interesting changes and fixes include newer Google Closure >> > > >> > > > Compiler and Library dependencies, self hosting tweaks, a Google >> > > >> > > > Closure modules (:modules compiler option) regression, >> > > >> > > > improved warnings, and minor REPL enhancements. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > As always feedback welcome! >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > ### Enhancements >> > > >> > > > * Refactor build pipeline >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1478: Self-host: Allow static-fns opt >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > ### Changes >> > > >> > > > * Generate larger range of random UUIDs >> > > >> > > > * make browser REPL file reloads less chatty >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1475: indicate that cljs.reader/read is safe >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1470: Bump GCL Dependency >> > > >> > > > * bump Google Closure dep >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > ### Fixes >> > > >> > > > * in system-time check that js/process.hrtime is actually a thing >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1228: cljs.util/topo-sort is polynomial on larger dependency >> > > > graphs >> > > >> > > > * check that performance.now method actually exists >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1476: Self-host: Protocol prefixing broken for three- (or more) >> > > > segment namespaces >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1472 Patch for CLJS-1467 causes regression for nodejscli >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1469 :modules regression >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1445: Syntax error for var args in protocol methods >> > > >> > > > * Warn if protocol impl methods do not match its protocol >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1451 Protocol impl do not support qualified method names >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1422: cljs.js/eval-str fails for ns form on node.js with simple >> > > > optimizations >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1423: self-host: Requiring analyzer/compiler breaks unchecked >> > > > Boolean >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1466: Improperly munged output path for GClosure JavaScript >> > > >> > > > * CLJS-1467: Foreign Libraries not included when using :main with >> > > > :simple or :advanced >> >> -- >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >> first post. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ClojureScript" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojurescript/AiCARjGT2Mg/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
