Works without problem with boot-cljs.
Roughly 20% decrease in compilation time.

Great work.

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:24 PM Francis Avila <fav...@breezeehr.com> wrote:

> Debug dependency problems with `lein deps :plugin-tree` and `:tree`. These
> show you what your actual dependencies are and why.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 12:15 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It appears one of your dependencies is pulling in an older version of
> Clojure.
>
> David
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:03 AM, David Petrovics <dpetrov...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Francis,
>>
>> I tried figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT, got the (No such var: ana/forms-seq*)
>> exception, then added [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"] to the plugins
>> and am now seeing:
>>
>> java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not locate cljs/analyzer__init.class
>> or cljs/analyzer.clj on classpath: ,
>> compiling:(figwheel_sidecar/utils.clj:1:1)
>>
>> I'm on [lein-cljsbuild "1.1.1"], [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"],
>>                           [org.clojure/clojure "1.7.0"],  [org.omcljs/om
>> "0.8.8"], [lein-figwheel "0.5.0-SNAPSHOT"]
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 5:44:03 AM UTC-5, Francis Avila wrote:
>> > For future travelers.
>> >
>> > If you use figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT you will get this exception:
>> >
>> >
>> > clojure.lang.Compiler$CompilerException: java.lang.RuntimeException: No
>> such var: ana/forms-seq*, compiling:(figwheel_sidecar/utils.clj:49:21)
>> >
>> > figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT has a dependency on cljs 1.7.145 even though it
>> needs 1.7.170.
>> >
>> > To resolve this error you must explicitly depend on clojurescript in
>> your plugins. Example:
>> >
>> > :plugins [[lein-figwheel "0.5.0-SNAPSHOT"]
>> >           [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"]] ;; Overrides broken
>> lein-figwheel dependency.
>> >
>> > lein deps :tree shows cljs 1.7.170 is used.
>> >
>> > So,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 3:30:05 AM UTC-6, Maria Geller wrote:
>> > > Try using 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT for figwheel ;)
>> > >
>> > > On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 9:59:24 PM UTC+13, Francis Avila
>> wrote:I'm getting the following exception with figwheel builds (using
>> 0.4.1):
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > java.lang.AbstractMethodError: Method
>> clojurescript_build/core/CompilableSourcePaths._find_sources(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;
>> is abstract
>> > >
>> > >  at clojurescript_build.core.CompilableSourcePaths._find_sources
>> (core.clj:-1)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > (cljsbuild works fine with version 1.1.1)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Nolan said "All the mentioned tools [inc. figwheel] have already
>> accounted for this change." I don't see any mention in the figwheel docs
>> about cljs 1.7.170 compatibility or any commit message that mentions it.
>> Can anyone confirm this is actually true for figwheel?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 6:05:19 AM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source
>> code.
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > Leiningen dependency information:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >     [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"]
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > This release includes a major refactor of the build pipeline thanks
>> to
>> > >
>> > > > Juho Teperi. This change along with some greatly simplified
>> > >
>> > > > recompilation logic will mean much faster cold build times for
>> larger
>> > >
>> > > > projects (some users have already reported >10X).
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > This is a breaking change for existing tooling. You will need to
>> > >
>> > > > upgrade lein-cljsbuild, lein-figwheel, and boot-cljs if you intend
>> to
>> > >
>> > > > adopt this version of ClojureScript. All the mentioned tools have
>> > >
>> > > > already accounted for this change. Refer to the appropriate
>> > >
>> > > > documentation for your tooling to determine which version number you
>> > >
>> > > > should adopt.
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > Other interesting changes and fixes include newer Google Closure
>> > >
>> > > > Compiler and Library dependencies, self hosting tweaks, a Google
>> > >
>> > > > Closure modules (:modules compiler option) regression,
>> > >
>> > > > improved warnings, and minor REPL enhancements.
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > As always feedback welcome!
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > ### Enhancements
>> > >
>> > > > * Refactor build pipeline
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1478: Self-host: Allow static-fns opt
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > ### Changes
>> > >
>> > > > * Generate larger range of random UUIDs
>> > >
>> > > > * make browser REPL file reloads less chatty
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1475: indicate that cljs.reader/read is safe
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1470: Bump GCL Dependency
>> > >
>> > > > * bump Google Closure dep
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > > ### Fixes
>> > >
>> > > > * in system-time check that js/process.hrtime is actually a thing
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1228: cljs.util/topo-sort is polynomial on larger dependency
>> graphs
>> > >
>> > > > * check that performance.now method actually exists
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1476: Self-host: Protocol prefixing broken for three- (or
>> more) segment namespaces
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1472 Patch for CLJS-1467 causes regression for nodejscli
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1469 :modules regression
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1445: Syntax error for var args in protocol methods
>> > >
>> > > > * Warn if protocol impl methods do not match its protocol
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1451 Protocol impl do not support qualified method names
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1422: cljs.js/eval-str fails for ns form on node.js with
>> simple optimizations
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1423: self-host: Requiring analyzer/compiler breaks
>> unchecked Boolean
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1466: Improperly munged output path for GClosure JavaScript
>> > >
>> > > > * CLJS-1467: Foreign Libraries not included when using :main with
>> :simple or :advanced
>>
>> --
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "ClojureScript" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>>
>
> --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> ---
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojurescript/AiCARjGT2Mg/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>
>
> To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>
> --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to