Hi Bill,

Same result with ext2 and mounting on /joe

This root partition is recognized as ext3 type on the box (being cloned, can
I called it clone-ee vs cloner). The clonee is RH AS4.0  (RedHat 4) about
2007 and  kernel 2.6.9.* .

So whatever mount(1) version and/or VFS version is placed in clonezilla, it
should be able to read that.

Is there any tools to actually read the superblock and see what type is
recorded?

Thanks

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Bill Gurley <gur...@ion.chem.utk.edu>wrote:

> You might try mounting as ext2.  But also, I would never try to mount to
> /mnt.  Make a directory in /mnt and use that.  e.g., /mnt/Temp
>
>
> On 09/15/2010 03:22 PM, Montaseri wrote:
> > Thanks Les and Andy,
> >
> > I suppose I can ignore this type recognition if I can solve my real
> > problem, which lead me to this inquiry.
> >
> > My real problem is that I would like to boot off of clonezilla and
> > proceed to mount the root filesystem (of the box being cloned) to learn
> > stuff from /etc such as IP of the box and such. This is to automate the
> > cloneing to an NFS location in a proper folder, for ease of restore and
> > such.
> >
> > Currently when I clonezilla fdisk reports my root filesystem type to be
> > 83. When I try to mount this like
> >
> > mount -t ext3  /dev/sda2 /mnt
> >
> > I get the following error message
> > VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev sda2
> > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda2 ...
> > .....and bunch of other suggestions including see dmesg
> >
> > Any suggestions...
> >
> > Thanks
> > Medi
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Clonezilla-live mailing list
Clonezilla-live@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live

Reply via email to