Let's verify actually that those tests do fail due to the large offerings.
I assumed they would also be a problem when we were fixing the shared
primary storage issue, but then this morning when I was dreaming about work
stuff I recalled the over provisioning settings, and that might make the
disk offerings a non issue.
On Jan 12, 2013 10:29 AM, "Ryan Dietrich" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, I'm new to the list/project.
>
> After running the DB deploy target, and starting cloudstack, the entries
> for the larger disk offerings kept coming back until I removed lines from:
>
> server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java
>
> -            createdefaultDiskOffering(null, "Medium", "Medium Disk, 20
> GB", 20, null, false, false);
> -            createdefaultDiskOffering(null, "Large", "Large Disk, 100
> GB", 100, null, false, false);
> -            createdefaultDiskOffering(null, "Large", "Large Disk, 100
> GB", 100, null, false, false);
>
> So, this section of code overrides whatever you have in the SQL/XML files?
>
> -Ryan Dietrich
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:40 PM, Rohit Yadav <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Okay, so we can do two things have a set of offerings provided via
> devcloud/devcloud-kvm.sql or users are free to create their own offerings.
> > We can add the small/med/large offerings such as 1/5/10GB offerings
> (local and nfs) or as you need them in the sql, commit ftw!
> >
> > Regards.
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Marcus Sorensen [[email protected]]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 6:15 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] modify devcloud storage setup
> >
> > I think 30GB is fine for devcloud given the 50MB tinylinux. I just wanted
> > the disk offerings in the zone to work with that.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Rohit Yadav <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes just sql changes, no change possible for that in devcloud. If one
> >> wants more disk space, they can resize vmdk and resizefs on devcloud and
> >> reboot.
> >> Current disk size is 30GB, do you want this to be extended? I think it
> >> should be sufficient for a small datacenter use case on basic zone on
> one's
> >> laptop.
> >>
> >> Regards.
> >>
> >> On 11-Jan-2013, at 3:50 PM, Marcus Sorensen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> We may also want to consider adjusting the disk offering sizes in
> >> devcloud,
> >>> we fail test_01_create_volume because (among other things) there is not
> >>> 100GB available to create a volume, as it tests all known disk
> offerings.
> >>> Maybe have small/med/large be 5GB, 10GB, 15GB. That's probably for the
> >> sql?
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen <[email protected]
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Yes, I see that it's currently hosted on people.apache.org, and I
> >> assumed
> >>>> you'd know how to replace it. This would help a lot. Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Rohit Yadav <[email protected]
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Cool, let's do both and have primary nfs and local storage. While
> >> having
> >>>>> local storage will be better for vm life cycle.
> >>>>> Yes, let's do this. Marcus, do you want me to create a new image with
> >>>>> these changes? I can do that this weekend.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards.
> >>>>> ________________________________________
> >>>>> From: Marcus Sorensen [[email protected]]
> >>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 1:33 AM
> >>>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>>> Subject: [PROPOSAL] modify devcloud storage setup
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In running integration tests, I noticed that the volume tests fail
> >> because
> >>>>> there are shared and local compute/disk offerings. I propose that we
> >> add
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> devcloud an /opt/storage/primarynfs directory, shared out in
> >> /etc/exports,
> >>>>> and we change the devcloud config to add this primary storage in.
> >>>>> Optionally, we can change the default tags to use local storage for
> >>>>> efficiency in other things, but this way there is both a local and a
> >>>>> shared
> >>>>> storage type for the tests to succeed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to