> -----Original Message----- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 1:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] modify devcloud storage setup > > > On 14-Jan-2013, at 11:51 AM, Marcus Sorensen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Rohit, > > I made a small addition to the marvin code that allows it set the > > storage type ("local" or "shared"), so we don't need to rely on having > > shared storage in devcloud, and can also test each independently in > > the future. So it will be nice to have automatically set up shared > > storage in devcloud but it's not a pressing issue (we can also create > > it manually as you mentioned). > > > > One side note, I noticed that the tiny linux template doesn't clear > > its resolv.conf via dhcp, it appends the cloudstack config to > > resolv.conf, which doesn't work since it's already got a bunch of > > nameserver and search entries. It would be nice if the tiny linux > > template either had an empty resolv.conf, or the dhcp client wiped out the > contents before setting it. > > I'm creating and advanced config and it's nice to have the networking > > all up and going by default. Do you maintain the tiny linux image, or > > know who does? > > I don't maintain it but I remember that it's actually ttylinux > (http://ttylinux.net) imaged to a vhd. > It's kind of old and I've seen it miss dhcp ip allocations (something wrong > with > its dhcp client). > May be we should create a new template for devcloud, which is based off > some small linux distro like damn small linux etc. which can run off a ramdisk > image. > Since the fix for primary/shared storage is easy and can be done in > /etc/exports, I'm skipping working on a new devcloud image now. May be > when we'll have a new template.
I thought I got the image from http://www.xen.org/files/ttylinux-i486-8.0.img. > > Regards. > > > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Marcus Sorensen > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Just to follow up on this, looks like the blocker was just the shared > >> storage. The capacities of the default disk offerings are fine for > >> the volume tests. > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Marcus Sorensen > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > >>> Let's verify actually that those tests do fail due to the large > >>> offerings. I assumed they would also be a problem when we were > >>> fixing the shared primary storage issue, but then this morning when > >>> I was dreaming about work stuff I recalled the over provisioning > >>> settings, and that might make the disk offerings a non issue. > >>> On Jan 12, 2013 10:29 AM, "Ryan Dietrich" <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, I'm new to the list/project. > >>>> > >>>> After running the DB deploy target, and starting cloudstack, the > >>>> entries for the larger disk offerings kept coming back until I removed > lines from: > >>>> > >>>> server/src/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java > >>>> > >>>> - createdefaultDiskOffering(null, "Medium", "Medium Disk, 20 > >>>> GB", 20, null, false, false); > >>>> - createdefaultDiskOffering(null, "Large", "Large Disk, 100 > >>>> GB", 100, null, false, false); > >>>> - createdefaultDiskOffering(null, "Large", "Large Disk, 100 > >>>> GB", 100, null, false, false); > >>>> > >>>> So, this section of code overrides whatever you have in the SQL/XML > >>>> files? > >>>> > >>>> -Ryan Dietrich > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:40 PM, Rohit Yadav <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Okay, so we can do two things have a set of offerings provided via > >>>> devcloud/devcloud-kvm.sql or users are free to create their own > offerings. > >>>>> We can add the small/med/large offerings such as 1/5/10GB > >>>>> offerings > >>>> (local and nfs) or as you need them in the sql, commit ftw! > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards. > >>>>> ________________________________________ > >>>>> From: Marcus Sorensen [[email protected]] > >>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 6:15 AM > >>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] modify devcloud storage setup > >>>>> > >>>>> I think 30GB is fine for devcloud given the 50MB tinylinux. I just > >>>> wanted > >>>>> the disk offerings in the zone to work with that. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Rohit Yadav > >>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Yes just sql changes, no change possible for that in devcloud. If > >>>>>> one wants more disk space, they can resize vmdk and resizefs on > >>>>>> devcloud > >>>> and > >>>>>> reboot. > >>>>>> Current disk size is 30GB, do you want this to be extended? I > >>>>>> think it should be sufficient for a small datacenter use case on > >>>>>> basic zone on > >>>> one's > >>>>>> laptop. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 11-Jan-2013, at 3:50 PM, Marcus Sorensen > <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> We may also want to consider adjusting the disk offering sizes > >>>>>>> in > >>>>>> devcloud, > >>>>>>> we fail test_01_create_volume because (among other things) > there > >>>>>>> is > >>>> not > >>>>>>> 100GB available to create a volume, as it tests all known disk > >>>> offerings. > >>>>>>> Maybe have small/med/large be 5GB, 10GB, 15GB. That's probably > >>>>>>> for > >>>> the > >>>>>> sql? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Marcus Sorensen < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Yes, I see that it's currently hosted on people.apache.org, and > >>>>>>>> I > >>>>>> assumed > >>>>>>>> you'd know how to replace it. This would help a lot. Thanks > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Rohit Yadav < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cool, let's do both and have primary nfs and local storage. > >>>>>>>>> While > >>>>>> having > >>>>>>>>> local storage will be better for vm life cycle. > >>>>>>>>> Yes, let's do this. Marcus, do you want me to create a new > >>>>>>>>> image > >>>> with > >>>>>>>>> these changes? I can do that this weekend. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards. > >>>>>>>>> ________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>> From: Marcus Sorensen [[email protected]] > >>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 1:33 AM > >>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>>>> Subject: [PROPOSAL] modify devcloud storage setup > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In running integration tests, I noticed that the volume tests > >>>>>>>>> fail > >>>>>> because > >>>>>>>>> there are shared and local compute/disk offerings. I propose > >>>>>>>>> that > >>>> we > >>>>>> add > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> devcloud an /opt/storage/primarynfs directory, shared out in > >>>>>> /etc/exports, > >>>>>>>>> and we change the devcloud config to add this primary storage in. > >>>>>>>>> Optionally, we can change the default tags to use local > >>>>>>>>> storage for efficiency in other things, but this way there is > >>>>>>>>> both a local and > >>>> a > >>>>>>>>> shared > >>>>>>>>> storage type for the tests to succeed. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>
