Ehhh, que se yo... me parece que lo miran desde un punto de vista donde las opciones son limitadas por definicion.
http://blogten.blogspot.com/2009/05/wards-comment.html On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:31 AM, GallegO <[email protected]> wrote: > > Se desato una discusion en el blog de cincom y rescato un comentario > que quiero compartir: > > Completo en http://bit.ly/Uu517 > > > > ...but I think the context of the quote is being misinterpreted > somewhat. My impression from the video wasn't that Bob was > misrepresenting Cunningham's meaning, but just that he wasn't > explaining it very well. > 'What killed Smalltalk is that it was just too easy to make a mess." > I think that's absolutely true, but it isn't necessarily a bad thing. > The truth is that in Smalltalk it's often easier to do anything, both > good and bad. It's rather like saying that the problem with a > motorcycle, compared to a bicycle, is that it's just too easy to go > too fast and wreck one. With programming languages, as with bikes, if > you give a powerful tool to an undisciplined, inexperienced user, they > can cause a lot of damage. > If the only vehicle you give someone is a one-gear bicycle with street > tires and training wheels, it'll be really hard for them to hurt > themselves, but they're never going to go very far or very fast, > either. > > Saludos > GallegO > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] http://www.clubSmalltalk.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
