En realidad, todos los lenguajes tienen un paraiso asi. Quiza el tema es que con Smalltalk es mas facil hacer cosas lindas, asi que el contraste entre lo bueno y lo no tan bueno es mas evidente.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Rusty <[email protected]> wrote: > > No sé si es lo que lo mató, o si siquiera está muerto. > Pero si sé que estoy de acuerdo con el comentario. > > Smalltalk es el paraíso de los buenos programadores. > Pero también es el paraíso para el desprolijo y el que ata con > alambre. > Y eso último es jo-di-do. > > Salutes. > > Rusty. > > On 10 nov, 10:31, GallegO <[email protected]> wrote: >> Se desato una discusion en el blog de cincom y rescato un comentario >> que quiero compartir: >> >> Completo enhttp://bit.ly/Uu517 >> >> ...but I think the context of the quote is being misinterpreted >> somewhat. My impression from the video wasn't that Bob was >> misrepresenting Cunningham's meaning, but just that he wasn't >> explaining it very well. >> 'What killed Smalltalk is that it was just too easy to make a mess." >> I think that's absolutely true, but it isn't necessarily a bad thing. >> The truth is that in Smalltalk it's often easier to do anything, both >> good and bad. It's rather like saying that the problem with a >> motorcycle, compared to a bicycle, is that it's just too easy to go >> too fast and wreck one. With programming languages, as with bikes, if >> you give a powerful tool to an undisciplined, inexperienced user, they >> can cause a lot of damage. >> If the only vehicle you give someone is a one-gear bicycle with street >> tires and training wheels, it'll be really hard for them to hurt >> themselves, but they're never going to go very far or very fast, >> either. >> >> Saludos >> GallegO > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] http://www.clubSmalltalk.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
