> I had posted a message regarding a possible attack on my web server, and got > a reply indicating the message would be posted to the list once reviewed by > a moderator. I've never seen this type of message before, so assumed the > list server is having a minor issue. Of course, I checked the address I > sent the message to and such, but saw no reason for the response I got. I > still haven't seen that message on the list - I'll repost it tonight if I > don't see it by then.
The problem is that if the address you are sending from does not match, excactly, the address you subscribed with the message will be flagged as requiring modertation because we do not allow non-subscribers to post to the list (too much spam). I believe the list is operating fine it is probably just that you sent from a different address than you usually use for posting. Maybe reply worked because you have some sort of smart "from address" picker that uses a specific address to reply to messages in the clug folder / mailing list / etc? I'm not sure what MUA you are using but I know I have behaviour like this in Mutt. > Seeing as a bunch of requests are being made, may I request that all users > on the list keep in mind that we all have different ways of viewing it? If > something in particular isn't suitable for the way I view/use the list, that > doesn't mean that same thing isn't suitable for someone else who may be > using different tools. Yes. Although one needs try and post in ways that the majority of the users will be able to read the message. This is why we frown upon HTML mail and such. To keep the majority of MUAs happy and displaying things properly reply to messages when you continue a thread. If you want to start a new thread one should just form a new message. Jeff > Shawn > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Mike Roest > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 6:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [clug-talk] OT: Request > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hey All, > I have a quick request, could people please not reply to an existing > thread to start a new topic. It really screws up those of us who are > using a threaded MUA. > > Thanks > > - -- > Mike > Site: http://www.blahz.org > GPG Key: http://www.blahz.org/gpg.asc > Let us celebrate our agreement with the adding of chocolate to milk. > - --Homer Simpson > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFAXu3+w+I3MvUBM6QRAkuMAJ9jbhvi8IUnmz1zNFD7iKT51p5KJgCdEx4w > ric9m79KMIG2OEqdEiq/GFI= > =+IwA > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > clug-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > > > _______________________________________________ > clug-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca > -- Jeff Clement http://jclement.ca
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
