On Wednesday 15 June 2005 21:03, Dave Bourassa wrote: > It's looking good, but in the interests of spouting feedback... > My 2 cents... I can handle the red, but reading the text is harder with > good old tux in the back ground. Would it be a sacrilege for me to > suggest "no back ground" or maybe a contrasting color if it's deemed > that a back ground is really necessary? I know, nobody else has > mentioned it, so maybe it's just my tired old eyes.
Goran has already sent me a replacement image to use for the background, with the logo faded a little more. Unfortunately it was faded to the point of being pure white (on my box at least). So I've restored the original image for now. To be honest, the site just looked "plain" with a pure white background, and didn't have any character IMO... but I do agree the background image needs to be modified somehow to help the black text on the grey portions of the image. My thought was just to fade it a little more, but that may not do the trick yet..... Shawn _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
