On 08/30/2010 09:07 PM, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: > ...o----o master > . \ > . o----o----o topic > . \ \ > ...o----o----o----o *next, origin/next
Perfect. > Is this what should be done in such cases? Yes. > Is there a way to signal the first merge to next as one that > should not be merged to master? Email notification to this list is a good way. Also, we only merge the latest head of each topic already in next into master. What becomes reachable from master only shows the single path: ...o----o-----...-----o master . \ / . o----o----o topic FYI, you can use the CMake Topic Stage http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake/Git#Topic_Stage to merge to next for you. We use it to keep track of topic heads that are not yet in master. After it merges to next the topic branch sticks around on the stage until we merge to master. Even for merges that contributors have been pushing directly to next I've been manually adding stage branches for them to make our merges to master easier. -Brad _______________________________________________ cmake-developers mailing list cmake-developers@cmake.org http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers