On 11/23/2011 4:08 PM, Sean McBride wrote: > How about Alex's suggestion to use the new TRE code only where it > gives the biggest win? (See his 12:20 message, part #3)...
I agreed with that suggestion in my 12:44 post: http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake-developers/2011-November/002633.html in my second paragraph: On 11/23/2011 12:44 PM, Brad King wrote: > However, the above does not need to stand in the way of solving the > problem you're addressing. We can simply set that goal aside for > now by not exposing TRE in the CMake language anywhere. Use it > just for cmCTestBuildHandler. but people kept going on "the above" part of the debate ;) -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
