On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:44 PM, James Bigler <jamesbig...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Bill Hoffman <bill.hoff...@kitware.com> > wrote: >> >> On 11/29/2011 2:41 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We found a workaround that does not require any source code >>> modifications. I added the description to the bug report: >>> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12381#c27872 >>> >> Good, glad you are up and running again. >> ... >> > > Does this mean we won't see any new and better regexp code in CMake? I for > one was looking forward to a better regexp engine. > > James > > > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers >
I think we're going to take it slow and make it well-thought-out before we put a new regex engine in... It will not be appearing in the upcoming 2.8.7 since nothing is even in 'next' yet, and we are still discussing the options. We'll keep sleeping on it till it seems cooked enough before we put something in 'next' to try out. Thx, David -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers