On 1/12/2012 5:47 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
But I'm not going to add support for things older than 0.9.6, this
stuff is ancient.
Okay, thanks.
Also, the examples given in the header are confusing because they
leave out the patch level from the string. I think the patch level
can be included as a fourth component in our OPENSSL_VERSION var.
Hm?
* 0.9.3a 0x0090301f
* 0.9.4 0x0090400f
* 1.2.3z 0x102031af
The format is specified as
MNNFFPPS
where
M = Major NN = Minor FF = Fix PP = Patch S = Status
The example 0x0090301f matches up to that as
M = 0 NN = 09 FF = 03 PP = 01 S = f
which should be
0.9.3.1f
The example with "z" in it makes no sense at all given the explanation
right above it:
* The status nibble has one of the values 0 for development, 1 to e for betas
* 1 to 14, and f for release. The patch level is exactly that.
The explanation you give in your new commit on the topic is more coherent.
Where did you get it that information?
Thanks,
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
