> On 1/13/2012 9:41 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: >>> The explanation you give in your new commit on the topic is more >>> coherent. >>> Where did you get it that information? >> >> The lines above the examples. >> >> Status = f -> this is a released version >> PP = 0x1 -> a > > That doesn't appear in my version. I guess they added it later.
No, indeed exactly the lines you quoted before. It's just that the patch level is encoded as number in the C constant, but written as letter in the string. Look again: * 0.9.3 0x0090300f PP: 0 -> no letter, S: f -> released version * 0.9.3a 0x0090301f PP: 1 -> a, S: f -> released version * 1.2.3z 0x102031af PP: 0x1a = 26 -> z, S: f -> released version Eike -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
