On Thursday 16 February 2012, David Cole wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote: > > On 2/16/2012 10:48 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > >> 5) configure_package_config_file(**) + write_basic_package_version_** > >> file() > >> > >> So, 5) ? > > > > Looks good. Thanks. > > > > -Brad > > > > -- > > > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-**developers<h > > ttp://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers> > > Sorry to be a latecomer to the conversation here, but is anybody else > concerned about potential confusion between PackageConfig and PkgConfig?
Does that mean you would prefer 1) configure_config_file() + write_basic_config_version_file() over 5) configure_package_config_file() + write_basic_package_version_file() because it contains only "config", but not "package_config" ? Or do you mean you would prefer the following ? 7) configure_cmake_package_config_file() + write_basic_cmake_package_version_file() This would be quite long... Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
