On 2/16/2012 1:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Actually I expected I would prefer this over the fixed names, but now that I've done it and look at what Config.cmake.in file I have to write, I think I liked the previous version with the fixed names (CONFIG_HELPER) better. I think it was easier to do, a simple scheme.
I think the fixed names are better/simpler too. I'm not fond of "CONFIG_HELPER" specifically. The information stored in them is about the *package* that the file is configuring, which is why I originally proposed the prefix "PACKAGE_". The INCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR is where the *package* goes, not where the config helper is/goes. It's also the same as the package version file input/output variable names. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
