Brad King wrote: > On 3/4/2012 5:29 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> I happened to read a little bit about CPack recently >> >> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:CPackPackageGenerators#Overview >> >> The recommendation is to not use MACOSX_BUNDLE when using cpack, so I >> thought maybe that makes it different enough to WIN32_EXECUTABLE that >> they should be different CMAKE_ properties. >> >> set(CMAKE_WIN32_EXECUTABLE ON) >> set(CMAKE_MACOSX_BUNDLE ON) >> >> That would also mean that I can actually submit the patch. I'm not so >> keen on having to change every generator instead. Actually I think the >> existing patch is better than touching every generator anyway (that's at >> least in part why there is an abstraction). > > That's an argument to not have a generalized property name at all, > so just SetPropertyDefault for WIN32_EXECUTABLE and MACOSX_BUNDLE > would be sufficient.
Ok. I have pushed win32_executable-and-macosx_bundle-initializers to stage. Can I go ahead and merge that to next? Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers