On Monday 05 November 2012, David Cole wrote: > I would prefer squish3_add_test and squish4_add_test, as the version number > goes with squish, not with the add_test... Keep the old macros and > functions with the same name and same meaning please. We've had too many > backwards incompatible complaints in 2.8.10 after only a few days out in > the real world.
Ok. I added squish_add_test[34]() yesterday. I agree squish[34]_add_test() looks nicer, but then the function doesn't have the correct prefix anymore, which should be "squish_". Should I do that anyway ? Or squish_v3_add_test(), squish_3_add_test(), squish_add_test_3(), squish_add_test_v3() ? Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
