I like squish_v3_add_test the best: keeps the conventional prefix, but still indicates the version it goes with.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Alexander Neundorf <neund...@kde.org> wrote: > On Monday 05 November 2012, David Cole wrote: >> I would prefer squish3_add_test and squish4_add_test, as the version number >> goes with squish, not with the add_test... Keep the old macros and >> functions with the same name and same meaning please. We've had too many >> backwards incompatible complaints in 2.8.10 after only a few days out in >> the real world. > > Ok. > I added squish_add_test[34]() yesterday. > I agree squish[34]_add_test() looks nicer, but then the function doesn't have > the correct prefix anymore, which should be "squish_". Should I do that anyway > ? > > Or squish_v3_add_test(), squish_3_add_test(), squish_add_test_3(), > squish_add_test_v3() ? > > Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
