Brad King wrote:

> Anyway, I think once the LINK_PUBLIC part of the policy is worked
> out then I'll perform one final review pass through the topic.
> I'd also like to have the CMP0019 test added to it covering the
> current form of the policy (since it's changed since you wrote the
> test before).  I can help work out any dashboard issues like those
> you encountered the first time.

There is another twist in the tail here. The existing topic on next is not 
taking account of the case where the link implementation is the link 
interface when exporting.

I have pushed new commits to my gitorious clone in the wip-target-interface 
branch. I also pushed the add-INTERFACE_LINK_LIBRARIES-property branch to my 
clone, which I recommend merging to next. If you give me a green light on 
that (and squash some of the commits together), I'll push the next batch of 
commits on top.

I didn't add the CMP0019 test to my branch. It cherry-picks cleanly though, 
so whenever you think you'll be able to resolve the test failures on the 
dashboard with it, feel free to merge it to next.

By the way, I noticed that fix-ExpandVariables-performance was not merged in 
the recent merge session. Is there a problem with it?

Thanks,

Steve.


--

Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to