On 02/07/2013 06:23 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Yes. This is a little inconvenient though. I wonder if we could allow tll > with object libraries? The call would set the includes and defines just like > any other target, and would not have any effect on linking, because that is > not appropriate for object libraries anyway.
I don't want to give the impression that object libraries can be linked by allowing them in tll. The semantics are hard to define because the usual transitive effects do not make sense. Since using them in tll is an error now we can always add it later. Since object libraries cannot be installed or exported usage requirements on them are less important. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
