Brad King wrote: > On 02/07/2013 06:23 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> Yes. This is a little inconvenient though. I wonder if we could allow tll >> with object libraries? The call would set the includes and defines just >> like any other target, and would not have any effect on linking, because >> that is not appropriate for object libraries anyway. > > I don't want to give the impression that object libraries can be linked > by allowing them in tll. The semantics are hard to define because the > usual transitive effects do not make sense. Since using them in tll is > an error now we can always add it later. Since object libraries cannot > be installed or exported usage requirements on them are less important. >
Yes, that makes sense. Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
