Matthew Woehlke wrote: > On 2013-06-28 09:06, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> Brad King wrote: >>> Perhaps the policy could also disallow the >>> APPEND mode altogether. IIRC I've participated in discussion >>> in the past about how APPEND is a bad approach anyway. >> >> I've never used it, but then I've never used export() except in unit >> tests of it either :). I don't think preserving the APPEND functionality >> is expensive. > > Do you not produce a fooConfig.cmake with export targets for your build > directories? :-) Ok, the boost buildsystem stuff does that actually yes. And I made kdsoap work like that too.
I don't see the great reason to avoid the install step though, so I don't generally have it as an aim. Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
