Brad King wrote: > On 08/05/2013 02:08 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > s...@rogue-research.com wrote: > >> very confusingly, Apple uses their own version numbering scheme. So > >> that's "Apple clang 4.0". It comes with whatever version of Xcode that > >> machine's running (4.4 I think?). > > > > any version checking like I do in the CXXFeatures test is entirely mood > > for Clang. > We need to fix this somehow or CMAKE_*_COMPILER_VERSION will be > useless for Clang. Sean, is there any way to extract the underlying > Clang version, perhaps with different preprocessor macros? We at > least need to be able to detect which version scheme is in use so > we can report it somehow.
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=202256403&build=2988951 Is that another case? Maybe a clang that is misdetected as gcc? For such an old gcc version it has a whole lot of features that are not really expected to be there. Eike --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
