On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:06 PM, Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote:
> On 2/13/2014 7:35 PM, Steve Wilson wrote: >> The topic name is ‘objective-c-support.’ > > Currently if CXX is enabled then .m sources get compiled as CXX. > See Modules/CMakeCXXCompiler.cmake.in: > > set(CMAKE_CXX_SOURCE_FILE_EXTENSIONS C;M;c++;cc;cpp;cxx;m;mm;CPP) > > In order to be compatible we need to make sure that is still > the case. However, if OBJC is enabled then that should be > preferred to CXX for .m sources. There isn’t anything specific in the code to make an accounting for this type of requirement. I’ll see what I can do and update the tests. > Is that the case with these > changes? Please add test cases to cover these combinations. > > IMO the capitalization "ObjC" looks nicer than "OBJC" and will > extend better to "ObjCXX" than "OBJCXX". I have no strong > preference if others disagree though. I don’t have a strong preference, but the preference I do have is for the OBJC (OBJCXX) form simply because it matches the capital cases of C and CXX in the CMAKE_* variables, which is the most common language type that users encounter.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
