On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:14:23 -0700, Steve Wilson said: >On Mavericks (OS X 10.9) there are two STL implementations: libstdc++ >and libc++.
That was also the case in 10.7 and 10.8. In 10.9 the default changed from libstdc++ to libc++ though. >I’m adding support for Objective-C++ and on Mavericks it >matters which C++ library is used for linking. Same in 10.7 and 10.8, and any OS really, since C++ ABIs are not super stable. >Is there a standard >mechanism already in place for handling the difference in CMake. I >checked for the -stdlib command line flag in the sources, but didn’t >find it anywhere. Or put it another way, do we require users to >decide themselves with STL implementation to use? To me, it's something the user (of CMake) chooses, very much like choosing to build as C89 or C99 or C++03 or C++11. Cheers, -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng s...@rogue-research.com Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
