Brad King wrote: > On 10/01/2014 07:46 PM, Aleix Pol wrote: > > I'm very interested in getting this in and iterating forward. > > > > Any comments? How do changes get integrated? > > My main concern is that the format has not been proven with a > corresponding implementation of an actual IDE/plugin to use it. > Once we start producing a format changing it later will be > problematic for compatibility. Even though we added a version > number to the file, an IDE might not be updated along with a > CMake that produces a newer version.
This probably needs a way to query for the IDE which versions the given CMake version supports, no? Otherwise a newer IDE may request version 3 and just get nothing because the CMake binary only supports 1 and 2. Eike --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
