On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Rolf Eike Beer <e...@sf-mail.de> wrote:
> Brad King wrote: > > On 10/01/2014 07:46 PM, Aleix Pol wrote: > > > I'm very interested in getting this in and iterating forward. > > > > > > Any comments? How do changes get integrated? > > > > My main concern is that the format has not been proven with a > > corresponding implementation of an actual IDE/plugin to use it. > > Once we start producing a format changing it later will be > > problematic for compatibility. Even though we added a version > > number to the file, an IDE might not be updated along with a > > CMake that produces a newer version. > > This probably needs a way to query for the IDE which versions the given > CMake > version supports, no? Otherwise a newer IDE may request version 3 and just > get > nothing because the CMake binary only supports 1 and 2. > > Eike > -- If it's not available then it should just error out. Aleix PS: I'm alive, working on this, when I get some free time
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
