> My solution needs to generate additional target indeed for one pre-generated > header, so if all your 1000+ targets will share same precompiled header > (given the compiler flags don't change) then you will have just one (single) > additional target.
It's very rare (not to mention risky) to be able to share a PCH with more than one target, because each target can have its own set of defines/flags and header inclusions, so we'd really end up with additional 1000+ targets. BTW, please note that the most recent test is still https://github.com/nanoant/CMakePCHCompiler/issues/1#issuecomment-77003296 > If CMake will support PCH natively I don't see any reason it will need extra > target, yet obviously there will be extra (Ninja) compiler rule for PCH. That's far better than extra targets. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
