Thank you for all your input.
I have attached an updated patch.

> The format for v6 looks plausibly the same as v4 and v5 but it is not clear.
Yes, as far as I can see they are the same.

> Therefore if the value is not at least 1000000 then we must assume the old 
> format.  Please update your version extraction macros accordingly.
Updated in patch

> Therefore I think we could use just `ARMCC` for both and make any needed 
> adaptations based on the version number.
> We could also consider just not identifying it for < 1000000 and leave 
> support for legacy versions up to future development by anyone else 
> interested in them.
I think it is OK to identify them and let the people that use the legacy 
versions update if necessary.

-Joakim.

Attachment: 0001-Add-ARMCC-toolchain-support.patch
Description: 0001-Add-ARMCC-toolchain-support.patch

-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to