On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Alan W. Irwin <ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca> wrote: > On 2015-11-17 16:44-0600 Robert Dailey wrote: > >> [...]Honestly all of this is a matter of taste, I don't expect >> everyone to agree on every little detail. I think the goal should be >> to strive for something a little more modern (determined by general >> consensus in the open source community) and most importantly enforce >> it. No matter what style you choose, consistency is what matters the >> most. > > > Well said. We used similar principles in the PLplot case and the > resulting code style consistency (implemented with uncrustify in that > case) within that project has been quite beneficial.
Tonight I will do some testing and submit a patch + example files converted to the style Brad suggested. We can fine-tune it as needed. I'll probably format cmake.h / cmake.cxx as an example. Note also that there is an extension for Visual Studio that lets you run clang format. I've used this and it's pretty useful. The link below (bottom of the page) has the link to download the plugin. http://llvm.org/builds/ -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
