On 7/31/06, Brad King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ... ] > Now, if anyone patient enough to read trough above CMakeLists.txt > files, I would be more than interested to hear is there anything that > could be improved. I have also two additional questions: Those look pretty nice to me. I'm glad you were able to produce that code in your first day of working with CMake.
Day 2 and the experience is still much like when I left Perl behind for Python - relieving ;-) Anyway, thanks to prompt responses to additional questions and kudos to you guys for such an excellent tool. Regards. _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
