On Nov 28, 2007 3:17 AM, E. Wing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Right now I think it's just an experiment to see how things might > work, how much effort would be involved, and how much of an impedance > mismatch there will be with how things are currently done. It sounds > like things may not progress any further unless a real long term > vision for CMake is developed and embraced.
Gee you want one of those? :-) Here's one: happy, shiny programmers using a happy, shiny, fullblown programming language to implement entire build systems with little or no reference to external Perl, Python, or Ruby code. People wouldn't have much need for those if CMake's language features were sufficient. Cheers, Brandon Van Every _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
