On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken Martin wrote: > >>>> Will Kitware consider making CMAKE_ALLOW_LOOSE_LOOP_CONSTRUCTS > >>>> default to on starting with 2.6.0 and doing away with this > >>>> annoying construct? > > > > Bill is looking into making this implicit. .e.g. if you do not specify > the > > matching arguments then you are using LOOSE_LOOP_CONSTRUCTS by default. > So > > folks who want it will get it, folks who do not will not get it, > effectively > > automatically on a construct by construct basis. > > > > Done: > > /cvsroot/CMake/CMake/Source/cmForEachCommand.cxx,v <-- > cmForEachCommand.cxx > new revision: 1.27; previous revision: 1.26 > /cvsroot/CMake/CMake/Source/cmFunctionCommand.cxx,v <-- > cmFunctionCommand.cxx > new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4 > /cvsroot/CMake/CMake/Source/cmIfCommand.cxx,v <-- cmIfCommand.cxx > new revision: 1.83; previous revision: 1.82 > /cvsroot/CMake/CMake/Source/cmMacroCommand.cxx,v <-- cmMacroCommand.cxx > new revision: 1.35; previous revision: 1.34 > /cvsroot/CMake/CMake/Source/cmMakefile.cxx,v <-- cmMakefile.cxx > new revision: 1.438; previous revision: 1.437 > /cvsroot/CMake/CMake/Source/cmWhileCommand.cxx,v <-- cmWhileCommand.cxx > new revision: 1.11; previous revision: 1.10 > > Enjoy! Sweet! Thanks Bill. -- Philip Lowman
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake