Hi Miquel, I am not here to critisize your work, on the contrary, your work is probably based on Jerry fath's work, which is based upon my work ;-) I did contribute to CMake too once a long while ago ;-)
> Current CVS/HEAD FindwxWidgets and I think the last release CMake > 2.4.8 supports upto wxWidgets 2.9. My humble apologies! When you mentioned that it was prepared for wx2.8 I doubted myself and looked again. And ofcourse I only looked at the top of the FindwxWidgets script, mentioning 2.6 a lot. At the bottom I see you are attempting to find up to 2.8. I will have to update my own project so it seems because it might be using a wrong script then. > I believe that the best approach is something that we can convince the > wxWidgets developers to integrate with there distribution. In the line > of wx-config. Better yet would be to create a set of CMakeLists.txt I wanted to do exactly that. Create a small executable that could function as a wx-config.exe for wxWidgets on Windows where CMAKE could benefit from the variables being set, and then kind of making the find process more integrated with the wxWidgets distribution. I would create it as rigorous as possible by scanning for the library files needed, registry keys and what not just to reliably find the installation. But it seems I will have to do some homework first. My need for this script came from the fact I believed that the findwxWidgets.cmake was outdated, but it is not. My apologies again. Who knows the wx guys will evantually switch to Cmake after all. They arlready made a huge switch to Doxygen after sticking to LaTEX documentation for ages. If you look at an example "bakefile" for any potential project here: http://www.wxwidgets.org/wiki/index.php/Bakefile Then I will take Cmake over Bakefile any day (not to say anything bad about Bakefile ofcourse ;-) Thanks for clarifying Miquel! - Jorgen _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake