On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11.04.08 11:24:11, Doug Gregor wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did so and of course a few small changes where needed :) I'll attach a > > > diff of those needed changes. With those changes cmake properly finds > > > the static libs if I provide the Boost_USE_STATIC_LIBS and it finds the > > > import libraries for the .dll's if I don't provide it (which I assume is > > > the right thing). It also properly finds debug vs. release versions of > > > the libraries. > > > > With these changes, things have been working very well for me on both > > Mac and Windows. > > Good. Thanks for the testing. > > > > If you need a test with MinGW too that will take a bit as I'll have to > > > set that up and compile boost first for that (not sure if its even > > > supported from boost's side). > > > > IIRC, Boost works with MinGW, but we don't put much effort into > > testing or maintaining it. > > <personal opinion> > My experience with MinGW so far is that its simply not ready yet for > projects such as boost or KDE, they still need some time. Thats why > I won't do work on getting KDevelop4 working on MinGW - at least not > without someone paying for it.
Well, I just got done compileing Boost 1.34.1 with MinGW. I would like to try this new FindBoost out in MinGW, but it looks like it really needs cmake 2.6. Is that true? Or will it work with CMake 2.4.8? -- Mike Jackson imikejackson _at_ gee-mail dot com _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
