On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 12:30 +0100, David Aldrich wrote: > Hi Michael > > > So, the options are: > > > > - use -whole-archive as you do now > > - make the Kernel library shared > > - link the dlopen'ed libraries against Kernel > > Thanks very much - I understand. I think I will keep the -whole-archive method. > > However, now I'm worried about how I link in the Python library: > > /usr/bin/c++ -O3 -DNDEBUG -Wall -m64 -o myProj -rdynamic -Wl,-whole-archive Kernel/libKernel.a -Wl,-no-whole-archive -ldl -lpython2.4 > > The dlopen'ed libraries may use the Python library. I guess I could include it in the -whole-archive part, but perhaps it would be better to link each shared library against Python. Would you agree? > > Sorry that I am now off topic w.r.t cmake. > > By the way, I think I am pretty much there with changing our build system from manually coded makefiles to cmake. I like cmake! Thanks for all your help in getting there. The support on this list is excellent. > > Best regards > > David > Hi David,
Considering all the hassle you have to go through. Why don't you build a shared libKernel.so library and let the runtime loader fix all the issues you're now trying to solve compile/link time? Best regards, Marcel Loose. _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
