On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 10:42:13AM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> This is very cool work Peter. How well is this generator doing with the
> CMake tests?
These are the current test results:
89% tests passed, 22 tests failed out of 203
Label Time Summary:
Label1 = 0.03 sec
Label2 = 0.03 sec
Total Test time (real) = 491.33 sec
The following tests FAILED:
12 - kwsys.testDynamicLoader (Failed)
40 - ExternalOBJ (Failed)
41 - LoadCommand (Failed)
52 - ExportImport (Failed)
55 - EmptyLibrary (OTHER_FAULT)
57 - BundleUtilities (Failed)
64 - LinkFlags-lib_config (Failed)
65 - LinkFlags-dll_config (Failed)
66 - LinkFlags-exe_config (Failed)
68 - SubProject-Stage2 (Failed)
74 - CustomCommand (Failed)
76 - OutOfSource (Failed)
77 - BuildDepends (Failed)
78 - SimpleInstall (Failed)
79 - SimpleInstall-Stage2 (Failed)
98 - LoadedCommandOneConfig (Failed)
100 - complexOneConfig (Failed)
99 - complex (Failed)
103 - ExternalProject (Failed)
120 - Plugin (Failed)
125 - SubDir (Failed)
203 - CMake.CheckSourceTree (Failed)
... which seems to be actually quite good, considering I haven't made
any special effort to try to pass the tests.
> Is there a nija for windows? I would be interested in
> testing that.
Yes, the current version of Ninja supports Windows, but the generator
would certainly need to be adapted.
Thanks,
--
Peter
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
