2011/9/13 Clifford Yapp <cliffy...@gmail.com>: > Eric - > > Excellent! That looks like it will do the trick. > > Thank you!
Please tell us about the performance but from the implementation of REMOVE_ITEM I bet the performance shouldn't be that good: inside cmListCommand.cxx: bool cmListCommand ::HandleRemoveItemCommand(std::vector<std::string> const& args) is using std::vector<std::string> (as Alex said) but the algorithm used for ITEM removal seems suboptimal. The two for loops may be merged in a single loop and avoid the erase call alltogether. If you are hitting a performance wall with the REMOVE_ITEM solution you may try to patch that. -- Erk Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
