On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Perry Ismangil wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:47, Eric Noulard <eric.noul...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The fact is it works the way you want, which is good, but beside that >> why would it be better for the user to face a failing build (because >> he forgot to create the file) >> than >> face a failing CMake run (because he forgot to create the file)? > > This is because for now, we are going to supply pre-made VS solution > files instead of geting developers running CMake on their Windows > machine. That is, we'll run CMake to generate VS 10 files and ship > that. > > So we're using CMake just as a VS10 generator at release time. > > Probably later on we'll decide if we just ship CMakeLists and get the > developers to run CMake generators themselves. If they do, then yes we > can generate this header on the fly like the configure/Makefile-based > system we use now on the Unix platforms. > > Thanks for the suggestions, much appreciated. > > Regards, > > -- > Perry Ismangil Aren't the Generated VS10 Solutions _still_ dependent on CMake or has that changed? ___________________________________________________________ Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net Principal Software Engineer mike.jack...@bluequartz.net BlueQuartz Software Dayton, Ohio _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
