I tried example like this

set(test_SRC main.cpp)
install(CODE "MESSAGE(\"CODE1\")")
add_executable(test ${test_SRC})
install(TARGETS test DESTINATION ${CMAKE_INSTALL_BINDIR})
install(CODE "MESSAGE(\"CODE2\")")

Then i checked cmake_install.cmake and "CODE1" cmd will be executed before strip command and "CODE2" will be executed after strip command.  So I think that this is the good place to invoke signing tool for release builds. Probably you should have two places with signing if you want to have signed binary in build tree and install tree. One in add_custom_command and one in install(CODE ... ). But it's not a big problem.

----------------------------------------
Best regards, Anatoly Belyaev

On 23.10.2018 13:33, Eric Noulard wrote:


Le mar. 23 oct. 2018 à 12:06, Craig Scott <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :



    On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:43 PM Eric Noulard
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Le lun. 22 oct. 2018 à 23:05, Craig Scott
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a
        écrit :


                Yes I agree that having build rpath is useful.
                I am not aware of any mechanism that enable calling
                some tool during CPack's install step.
                Moreover I don't use MacOS at all so I don't have any
                experience with PackageMaker.

                May be some Mac user may shed some more light on this.


            You should be able to do this using install(SCRIPT) or
            install(CODE), invoking the code signing through
            execute_process() as part of that script/code.


        I wasn't sure of that.

        So just to be clear  do we know for sure that install(SCRIPT)
        install(CODE) will run after the CMake builtin-generated
        install scripts?
        The builtin generated install script for target includes
        stripping, so for signing to work as expect we should be sure
        of the execution order?
        Or may be you suggest not to install(TARGET) for the concerned
        target and write install(SCRIPT) replacement for those?


    My understanding is that install() commands are generally
    processed in the order in which they appear in the directory
    scope. It is unspecified how the order between directory scopes
    behaves, although this merge request
    <https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/2434> (now
    merged to master) makes things much more predictable.

    I missed the earlier detail about when stripping occurred in
    relation to installing. From what I can see, I think the stripping
    happens right after the executable is copied/installed. Have a
    look at the generated cmake_install.cmake file for one of your
    builds and search for CMAKE_INSTALL_DO_STRIP to see how things get
    processed. If you add your own install(CODE) or install(SCRIPT)
    calls after you've done the install(TARGETS) calls, I would expect
    them to come after the stripping, but I haven't tested this.


I'll have a look, not that I need it but I'd like to know.
Thank you Craig.

--
Eric

-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to