|
Advance Beneficiary Notice (I think since this is a new “word for me! lol!!) Actually we always just called them Medicare cut letters here. The latest PPS alert I got had a nice article on them. Appear to be two-1 for technical ineligibility on admission, 1 for not medically necessary/not skilled care.
-----Original Message-----
I agree with you. By the
way, what are ABN letters? I would not change my decision just because you will get a category. For multiple reasons such as condition is chronic but stable, insulin qd is not a skillable service your intermediary may agree with your decision. If you tell someone Medicare will pay and they don’t you are financially liable and will sustain a loss. However, this is why we do the next appropriate MDS on everyone we cut ( off rehab do the OMRA and sometimes depending on how much time it covers the next regular PPS and if not rehab the next regularly scheduled PPS assessment). We submit them but use the RUGS category on our demand bill so if by chance the FI disagrees with us we get reimbursed at the correct rate. We do not get many of our decisions overturned but when we do the loss by accepting default rate is unacceptable to our administration. It is a little extra work but worth it in the end. Demand bills are the reason I am so excited about the new ABN letters. The old ones are not clear and I do not believe people really understand what they are checking. The new ones are much clearer and I hope will cut down on Demand bills. I don’t begrudge anyone their rights but they are a pain.
-----Original Message-----
You need to do an omra and continue to assess him on a medicare schedule.He will likely be eligible for more medicare. This has happened to us and we just rescind the Medicare cut.
-- -----------------------------------------------------Click here for Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/free_video/ |
Title: Clear Day
- demand billing Deb Wilmhoff
- Re: demand billing edart6
- RE: demand billing Ann Schoeny
- Re: demand billing Deb Wilmhoff
- RE: demand billing Faye Jones
- Re: demand billing Deb Wilmhoff
- Re: demand billing stephanie deon
- RE: demand billing Faye Jones
- Re: demand billing m silberg
- Re: demand billing Faye Jones
- Re: demand billing Bogda Habich
- RE: demand billing Faye Jones
