Hi Sue
Thanks for the information
Take Care Shannon

On Monday, November 10, 2014 10:14:12 PM UTC+11, ZeroClub#1197 wrote:
>
> Hi Shannon 
>
>  
>
> There is also the Destiny Trial in the UK  which is reduction down to 
> 200mg for 12 months and then stop (there has been no report until after Dec 
> 2014)  
>
> The next Trial is named Spirit3 to see if people are being over medicated 
>
>  
>
> The Australian Survey will have 600 participants 
>
>  
>
> Sue Hurt
>
> (Australian)
>
>  
>
> *From:* cml...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> [mailto:
> cml...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>] 
> *Sent:* Monday, 10 November 2014 6:22 PM
> *To:* Digest recipients
> *Subject:* [CMLHope] Digest for cml...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> - 6 
> updates in 2 topics
>
>  
>
> cmlhope@googlegroups.com 
>
> Google Groups 
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email/#!overview>
>  
>
>
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email/#!overview>
>
> Topic digest 
> View all topics 
>
> ·         Glivec and studies of stopping the drug 
> <#002301cffcd7$6d393e70$47abbb50$@iinet.net.au_group_thread_0> - 5 Updates 
>
> ·         Glivec and studies of stopping the drug 
> <#002301cffcd7$6d393e70$47abbb50$@iinet.net.au_group_thread_1> - 1 Update 
>
> Glivec and studies of stopping the drug 
> <http://groups.google.com/group/cmlhope/t/839da881a2e6e455?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email>
>
> Shannon L <shannon...@gmail.com <javascript:>>: Nov 09 03:58AM -0800 
>
> Hi All My name is Shannon I live in Sydney Australia
> Its been awhile since I have posted.
> I was diagnosed 1998 and after a few years went onto sti571 (glivec) and 
> achieved remission within 2 months and I have been it ever since about 14 
> yrs.
> They are inviting participants (in Australia) to take a survey of stopping 
> glivec I image they will do a study of stopping the drug.
> My question is does everyone know of the study done in USA of the stats of 
> stopping they have indicated in this survey info that the percentage of 
> success is 30-40% to me that SEEMS LOW what do you think.
> I do have some problems but I am stable on glivec.
> I hope this emil finds everyone well
> Shannon
>
> Marty Gartenberg <wa2...@gmail.com <javascript:>>: Nov 09 07:46AM -0500 
>
> Hi Shannon, there is a study called the STIM that is going on in the UK and
> it talks about Imatinib being stopped. It is kind of lengthily however it
> does go into detail.
> Good luck to you, and I have always said there will be a cure for CML in
> our lifetimes.
> If you follow any of my posts I always end them with two numbers. They are
> 18 which is the symbol for life.
> 18's to you Shannon
> Marty
> PS Shannon I encourage you to post any time that you like. There will
> usually be someone that may be able to answer your questions. Besides that
> we are all here to learn from and help each other
> Can Imatinib Be Stopped?
>  
> Goodwin, Peter
> Article Outline
> [image: Collapse Box]Author Information
>  
> ASH Abstracts 186 and 187
>  
> SAN FRANCISCO—The early promise of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)
> imatinib for treating chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has continued to be
> fulfilled following the release of seven-year follow-up data at the ASH
> Annual Meeting here from the International Randomized Study of Interferon
> versus STI 571 (imatinib) (IRIS) with 553 patients.
>  
> With diminishing rates of progression each year beyond year three, the case
> for stopping imatinib altogether was also discussed at the meeting
> following release of results from two studies in which the drug was
> discontinued among patients who had achieved enduring complete molecular
> responses to it for more than two years.
>  
> IRIS investigator Stephen G. O'Brien MD, PhD, Senior Lecturer in
> Experimental Hematology at Northern Institute for Cancer Research of
> University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, gave the latest IRIS results to a
> packed audience at the meeting, showing an event-free survival rate of 81%,
> freedom from progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis of 93%, and an
> estimated overall survival rate of 86%, from the standard dose of 400 mg
> imatinib daily.
>  
> And in the presentation that followed, François-Xavier Mahon, MD, Professor
> at Victor Ségalen University in Bordeaux, France, released early data from
> the Stop Imatinib (STIM) study, noting that remissions continued in about
> half of the patients after investigational discontinuation of imatinib
> therapy—with a non-significant trend showing that patients previously
> treated with interferon were more likely to be among those whose remissions
> persisted without drugs.
>  
> Dr. O'Brien said that in IRIS the projected cytogenetic response rate to
> imatinib (by Kaplan Meyer analysis) was 82%, and that after seven years of
> follow-up 60% of patients were still on imatinib, with 57% of all patients
> still in complete cytogenetic response (CCR).
>  
> The impression that CCR holds the key to a “cure” of CML was strengthened
> by comments he made after his talk:
>  
> “It seems that if you maintain your CCR for, say, three years, the chance
> of regressing at that point is essentially zero. So, achieving a CCR is, I
> guess, what we call a ‘safe haven’ for the majority of patients: If you've
> achieved that and sustained it for, say, three years, you're in pretty good
> shape and the chance of progressing is virtually nil,” he said.
> Back to Top
> <
> http://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2009/02101/Can_Imatinib_Be_Stopped_.1.aspx#
>  
> <http://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2009/02101/Can_Imatinib_Be_Stopped_.1.aspx>
> >
> | Article Outline
> Diminishing Rates of Relapse
>  
> These words reflect the diminishing rates of relapse observed in the IRIS
> study in successive years. Rates of progression to accelerate phase or
> blast crisis each year were low at all times—with rates rising in the first
> two years (1.5% in the first year; 2.8% in the second year) and then
> diminishing after that (1.6%, 0.9%, 0.5%, 0%, 0.4% in years 3, 4, 5, 6, and
> 7, respectively)—with only a single patient having disease progression to
> accelerate phase or blast crisis between years six and seven.
> [image: Figure. FRANOIS-XAVI...]
> Figure. FRANOIS-XAVI...
> Image Tools
>  
> The total annual event rates, including loss of molecular complete
> remission and death, were similarly low (3.3% and 7.5%) in years one and
> two, and diminished thereafter (4.8%, 1.7%, 0.8%, 0.3%, and 2.0% in years
> three through seven).
>  
> These data only apply, of course, to the majority of patients who prove
> sensitive to imatinib, and Dr. O'Brien noted that many patients who are
> resistant or refractory to the TKI are now candidates for other drugs and
> in some cases, allogeneic transplantation.
>  
> Dr. O'Brien summed up his feelings about the current state of the art
> concerning imatinib therapy for CML: “I think it's encouraging on two
> fronts. One is that there's nothing new in years six and seven to cause
> alarm in terms of safety events. And the second is—particularly in patients
> who achieved a complete cytogenetic response—I think we can be very
> reassured that the vast majority—especially if you have that CCR for three
> years—are doing extremely well, with very few of those progressing.”
> Back to Top
> <
> http://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2009/02101/Can_Imatinib_Be_Stopped_.1.aspx#
>  
> <http://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2009/02101/Can_Imatinib_Be_Stopped_.1.aspx>
> >
> | Article Outline
> STIM Study
>  
> Encouraging data on long-term remission of CML among patients treated with
> imatinib gave rise to the French initiative to conduct a pilot study with
> 15 patients looking at stopping imatinib, and following this the
> multicenter STIM study with 50 patients, which began in July 2007 but which
> has already yielded early—but provocative—evidence that remission from CML
> can continue even after imatinib is stopped.
>  
> Dr. Mahon said that patients were recruited into these studies only if they
> had received imatinib for at least three years and achieved sustained
> complete molecular remission (CMR) for two years before experimentally
> stopping the drug.
>  
> The definition of sustained CMR was strict: BCR-ABL/ABL had to be below a
> detection threshold corresponding to a 5-log reduction (undetectable signal
> using RQ-PCR) for at least two years. Molecular relapse was defined as
> RQ-PCR positivity detected in two successive assays, and patients who
> relapsed were then retreated with imatinib (successfully) at a dose of 400
> mg daily.
>  
> In the latest follow-up of the pilot study, Dr. Mahon said that seven out
> of 15 patients had relapse within six months and all were restored to CMR
> by re-treatment with imatinib. The remaining eight patients were still in
> CMR a median of 37 months after stopping the drug.
>  
> All of the patients in the pilot study had been treated with interferon
> before receiving imatinib, most of them responding to it. This raised the
> suggestion—which Dr. Mahon discussed in his talk at the ASH meeting—that
> interferon may have conferred a benefit among patients who were
> subsequently treated with imatinib.
>  
> Half of the patients in the STIM study had been pretreated with interferon,
> and some provocative—but as yet not statistically significant—data have
> emerged showing an advantage among those who had previously received
> interferon before going on to imatinib therapy.
>  
> By July 2008, 10 of the 15 patients who were still in CMR had received
> prior interferon. The latest assessment from a slide Dr. Mahon presented
> showed that 27 out of 49 patients followed for more than six months had had
> disease relapse; 14 of these had received only imatinib and the remaining
> 13 had been previously treated with interferon, while only two of the seven
> patients in STIM who have so far continued in CMR for 14 months had been
> treated with imatinib alone.
>  
> Dr. Mahon summed up his interim conclusions by stating that they have
> confirmed that CMR can be sustained after stopping imatinib, and that
> although there seems to be an [as yet statistically unconfirmed] advantage
> among the patients who received interferon, it is possible to stop the drug
> in patients with sustained CMR even among those treated with imatinib 
> alone.
>  
> He reported that the probability of survival without molecular relapse nine
> months after discontinuing imatinib was 46%, with the curve looking flat,
> so far, out to 15 months. Importantly, the STIM study found that all
> patients were sensitive after imatinib re-challenge.
> Back to Top
> <
> http://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2009/02101/Can_Imatinib_Be_Stopped_.1.aspx#
>  
> <http://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2009/02101/Can_Imatinib_Be_Stopped_.1.aspx>
> >
> | Article Outline
> ‘Recurring Question’
>  
> When Dr. O'Brien was asked for a comment on Dr. Mahon's conclusion from the
> initial pilot study and the early results from the STIM study, he said,
> “I'm fascinated by it. There's probably a bit of a cultural difference, I
> think, because most of my patients in the UK—when I suggest
> [stopping]—don't want to hand their pills back, and want to carry on.
> [image: Figure. STEPHEN G. O...]
> Figure. STEPHEN G. O...
> Image Tools
>  
> “I think that's driven by the fact that they are tolerating the drug well.
> There are no safety concerns emerging with the long-term follow-up. And
> it's obviously having good efficacy in them. But this is a recurring
> question that I think we'll see more and more of—and the French study is
> very important.”
> Back to Top
> <
> http://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2009/02101/Can_Imatinib_Be_Stopped_.1.aspx#
>  
> <http://journals.lww.com/oncology-times/Fulltext/2009/02101/Can_Imatinib_Be_Stopped_.1.aspx>
> >
> | Article Outline
> Low Toxicities
>  
> In the UK, he noted, the preference for continuing imatinib could be
> explained by relatively low toxicities, which were not a significant
> barrier to its use, with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia being minor
> toxicities that are merely irritating over time.
>  
> “GI toxicity like diarrhea, for example, and a feeling of fatigue and
> malaise, sometimes, and muscle cramps can be troublesome in some patients
> over the years. But they're usually minor toxicities which, after many
> years, become rather wearing, rather than major toxicities,” he said.
>  
> The bottom line for clinicians treating their patients with CML, according
> to Dr. O'Brien's interpretation of his IRIS results, is that imatinib at
> 400 mg remains the current standard for first-line drug therapy, even
> though there are exciting data among patient cohorts treated with nilotinib
> and dasatinib first-line, with cytogenetic response rates in excess of 95%.
>  
> “I think—for the future—where we're going is to do comparative Phase III
> studies with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors in newly diagnosed patients to
> see if we can improve on imatinib. Because although the imatinib data is
> reassuring, it's clear that at six or seven years, perhaps a third of
> patients are not continuing on imatinib,” he said.
>  
> *Supported by funding from Genentech BioOncology and Biogen Idec.*
>  
> © 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
>  
>
> Shannon L <shannon...@gmail.com <javascript:>>: Nov 09 03:52PM -0800 
>
> Hi Everyone
> Thankyou Marty for the research information it was very informative, so 
> they are combining stopping with interferon unfortunately I can't tolerate 
> it I remember the first time before glivec.
> I hope everyone is having a wonderful day.
>  
> On Sunday, November 9, 2014 10:58:55 PM UTC+11, Shannon L wrote:
>
> Richard H <rbhuf...@gmail.com <javascript:>>: Nov 09 09:33PM -0800 
>
> What a great record. You didn't indicate how much Gleevec you are taking. 
> I have read that several CMLers are taking reduced amounts and reaming in 
> remission. I have seen a post by a lady that said see was very petite and 
> she was only taking 100mg instead of 400mg. 
> I don't know the percentage or of a combined results From the different 
> studies I read sometime ago I believe the range you have is consistent 
> with 
> what I have read. You can read my results below. My ONC told be I needed 
> to end my almost 6 year vacation and I am trying to requalify for a lower 
> copay for Bosutinib. I have tested and they found no mutation. I have 
> studied the side effects and I will be meeting with a Nurse to go over the 
> side effects. Due to my other problems I am concerned about all the 
> interactions with those Meds. 
> I hope this has helped you.
>  
> Richard H.
>  
> Dxd 2/2003 
>  
> 400mg Gleevec 3/2003
>  
> Undetectable 11/03
>  
> RT-PCR negative 11/04
>  
> QT-PCR .003 11/05
>  
> RBC 8.
>  
> Gleevec Vacation 11/06-6/07 
>  
> Iron infusion 11/06
>  
> Transfusions 12/06-5/07
>  
> QT-PCR .007
>  
> Gleevec 1/08 -5/08
>  
> Procrit 8/08-11/08 
>  
> Gleevec Vacation 7/08-Present
>  
> QT-PCR .003 4/09
>  
> QT-PCR .0015 6/09
>  
> QT-PCR .0021 9/09
>  
> QT-PCR .0028 1/10
>  
> QT-PCR .001 4/10
>  
> QT-PCR .00468 10/10
>  
> QT-PCR 1.049% 2/11
>  
> QT-PCR .0612% 8/11
>  
> QT-PCR 2.616 % 2/12
>  
> QT-PCR 2.410% 8/12
>  
> RT-PCR 9.183% 4/13
>  
> RT-PCR 4.57% 6/13
>  
> RT-PCR 10.183% 10/13
>  
> RT-PCR 10.577% 2/14
>  
> RT-PCR 16.050% 5/14
>
> On Sunday, November 9, 2014 5:58:55 AM UTC-6, Shannon L wrote:
>  
>
> Shannon L <shannon...@gmail.com <javascript:>>: Nov 09 10:56PM -0800 
>
> Hi Richard H
>  
> Yes Glivec 400 mg has been good to me I have been very stable on the drug, 
> Wow 6 years off glivec thank you so much for sharing your results just a 
> question in your first holiday off glivec you had an iron injection is 
> this 
> because of cml? I am contemplating a small break as my stomach problems 
> seem to be increasing and are at times very debilitating. I know I have 
> been on many meds prior to glivec (chemo twice, cytarabine, hydroxia, and 
> interferon) and Im sure my body sometimes struggles with it all.
>  
> On Sunday, November 9, 2014 10:58:55 PM UTC+11, Shannon L wrote:
>
> Back to top <#002301cffcd7$6d393e70$47abbb50$@iinet.net.au_digest_top> 
>
> Glivec and studies of stopping the drug 
> <http://groups.google.com/group/cmlhope/t/22ca310a00448c54?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email>
>
> myve...@aol.com <javascript:>: Nov 09 07:32AM -0500 
>
> Hi Shannon, I started Gleevec on Jan. 10th 2000. I've been on it all 
> these years also but I haven't heard anything about Novartis stopping the 
> drug. They are making way to much money selling it. I wouldn't worry about 
> it. I also have some short coming on the drug but I can handle the side 
> effects. 
>
> Hope all is well with you,
>
> Greenie
> Fort Myers, Fl.
> USA
>
>
> In a message dated 11/9/2014 6:58:59 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
> shannon...@gmail.com <javascript:> writes:
>  
> Hi All My name is Shannon I live in Sydney Australia 
> Its been awhile since I have posted.
> I was diagnosed 1998 and after a few years went onto sti571 (glivec) and 
> achieved remission within 2 months and I have been it ever since about 14 
> yrs.
> They are inviting participants (in Australia) to take a survey of stopping 
> glivec I image they will do a study of stopping the drug.
> My question is does everyone know of the study done in USA of the stats of 
> stopping they have indicated in this survey info that the percentage of 
> success is 30-40% to me that SEEMS LOW what do you think.
> I do have some problems but I am stable on glivec.
> I hope this emil finds everyone well
> Shannon
>  
> -- 
> -- 
> [CMLHope]
> A support group of _http://cmlhope.com_ (http://cmlhope.com/) 
> -------------------------------------------------
>  
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "CMLHope" group.
> To post to this group, send email to cml...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> cmlhope-u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/CMLHope
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "CMLHope" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to _cmlhope+u...@googlegroups.com_ <javascript:> 
> (mailto:cmlhop...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>) .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> Back to top <#002301cffcd7$6d393e70$47abbb50$@iinet.net.au_digest_top> 
>
> You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this 
> group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an 
> email to cmlhope+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
>
>  
>

-- 
-- 
[CMLHope]
A support group of http://cmlhope.com
-------------------------------------------------

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CMLHope" group.
To post to this group, send email to CMLHope@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cmlhope-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CMLHope
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CMLHope" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to cmlhope+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to