As Naden mentioned, there WireHose has frameworks which you could use for CMS. We're actually using some of their frameworks to build a Digital Asset Management System here at Cornell. We initially started with Artesia Teams for this but dumped them like a bad habit for several reasons.
There is a WO CMS called ArticleBase http://articlebase.com. You might take a look at them. On 10/31/02 3:20 AM, "Naden Franciscus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heh, > > I am just in the middle of writing our second version of our CMS in > WebObjects. It's highly tuned for Curtin so it isn't much use for > external use just yet. I am a little out of it so dot point will have > to suffice: > > - WebObjects is a superb product and if your looking at an in house > solution then WebObjects will be better than most things on the market. > > - WebObjects is a proper J2EE app server, so you can drop in any J2EE > CMS around. This means most Java CMS around will work without any > problems. > > - There are no decent WebObjects CMS around. There is a framework at > Wirehose (www.wirehose.net) but its not really what your after. > > - If you have technical questions about WebObjects post a message to > the WebObjects developer list (www.omnigroup.com/developer). > > - Remember that OSX is pretty top notch now, so I am sure any CMS you > find will be deployable without any problems. > > Good luck, > > Naden Cheers! Todd R. Warfel _//message first [method second] .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--. _//user experience architect Information architecture Interaction design Usability analysis [P] (607) 339-9640 [E] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [w] http://www.mk27.com .--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--.==.--. In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, they're not -- anonymous -- http://cms-list.org/ trim your replies for good karma.
