Not necessarily, it depends on the timing of the queries. Unless you see something wrong with me wanting to do it this way, I'd prefer suggestions for how to accomplish it (rather than suggestions I'm crazy for wanting to do so, 'cos I get enough of those already ;-). Peace ... -- bc
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> wrote: > On Jan 4, 2011, at 18:33, Bob Cronin wrote: > > > Uh, because if I choose the same worker every time and it does not > process > > its spool files faster than they're arriving (common), it will quickly > get > > overloaded. I want to spread the load evenly across the "n" workers. > > > No, because once it's processing a spool file, it is no longer the one > with the fewest total spool files, and some other worker will be chosen. > > -- gil >
