I'm getting tired of fighting the CMS stage and the address CMS (statement
or REXX' default).


Kris Buelens,
     --- freelance z/VM consultant, Belgium ---
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


2014-06-25 21:34 GMT+02:00 Shimon Lebowitz <shimon...@gmail.com>:

> As soon as I saw that "CMS GLOBALV" I sort of gasped, and
> was sure Kris would immediately respond. :)
>
> It does seem easy enough to create a GLOBALV EXEC and then open
> an APAR when the compiler fails.
>
> Shimon
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Rob van der Heij <rvdh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Or maybe have a GLOBALV EXEC on your A-disk that does not produce more
> than
> > 1 line of output... ;-)
> >
> > If this is how they access the GLOBALV variables, I'm not sure I want to
> > sit next to them at dinner (sharp steak knifes etc)
> >
> >
> > On 25 June 2014 20:08, Glenn Knickerbocker <n...@bestweb.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On 6/25/2014 8:08 AM, Jonathan Scott wrote:
> > > >  PIPE ( ENDCHAR ? )
> > > >    CMS GLOBALV SELECT CENV LIST
> > > >  | DROP FIRST 1
> > > >  | STRIP LEADING BLANK 1
> > > >  | APPEND LITERAL
> > > >  | JOIN * H00
> > > >  | STORAGE 06B7CC28 300 E0
> > > >  | COUNT BYTES
> > > >  | STORAGE 06B7C7F0 11 E0
> > >
> > > D'oh!  I don't know why it didn't occur to me that the compiler module
> > > would be CALLING Pipelines.  That makes the PUSH workaround make sense.
> > >
> > > ¬R
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to