Yes, for the result the OP finally stated I agree joincont would be the way to go, but that was unclear in the original post. Thus the "'||join * /;/', /* process one group here */" in my post to suggest additional logic could be applied even though yes, that too could in most cases could follow a simple joincont. It just got me to wondering though how much could be done in terms of emulating a sipping rexx stage without resorting to rexx. Which led to the poser of why the take last - gate construct didn't work as I would have expected. That's the real reason for my post, not suggesting a solution for the OP's message.
-- Mike Harding z/VM System Support mhard...@us.ibm.com mikehard...@mindless.com (925) 672-3922 | (925) 672-4403 (h) (925) 323-2070 (m) /sp CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List <CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU> wrote on 03/24/2017 01:09:18 PM: > From: Rob van der Heij <robvdh...@vnet.ibm.com> > To: CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU > Date: 03/24/2017 01:16 PM > Subject: Re: Pipethink and filtering. CP QUERY PATHS 0-FFFF > Sent by: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List <CMS-PIPELINES@VM.MARIST.EDU> > > > Perfect for a sipping stage I thought when I read the initial post, before > > seeing the "pure pipes" preference; then I wondered if an equivalent could > > be accomplished with pipcmd. > > I am often wrong, but why go all that way to mimic a built-in stage?You can do > all that with joincont from what I see. > > So I understand we're after showing the original CP response for that device, > just have not heard what 'that device' would be. Is it when the > signs for (LPM) > don't match (PIM) or when there ar any '-' sings on (LPM), or what? > > Sir Rob the Plumber >
